By ERIC DASH and JONATHAN D. GLATER
Citigroup announced late Saturday that it had persuaded a New York judge to temporarily block Wells Fargo from acquiring Wachovia, firing the first shot in what could be a prolonged legal battle.
Citigroup has accused Wells Fargo of wrecking its plan to acquire Wachovia’s banking operations for $2.2 billion, or $1 a share, in a deal arranged by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Four days after that deal was struck, it fell apart when Wachovia agreed to Wells Fargo’s offer to pay seven times as much for the entire company.
The underlying battle is over which company will emerge from the economic crisis in a stronger position among a smaller number of financial giants. Citigroup contends that the deal with Wells Fargo violates an agreement that prohibited Wachovia from having any sale or merger discussions with anyone other than Citigroup until Oct. 6.
The order issued by a judge on Saturday extends the term of that agreement until further court action, Citigroup said. A person briefed on the situation said that Citigroup was seeking $60 billion in damages from Wells Fargo for interfering with the initial transaction.
Efforts to reach a Wells Fargo representative late Saturday night were unsuccessful. Christy Phillips-Brown, a Wachovia spokeswoman, said the bank “believes its agreement with Wells is proper, valid, and is in the best interest of shareholders, employees and American taxpayers.”
“Under that agreement,” Ms. Phillips-Brown continued, “Citigroup is always free to make a superior offer to Wachovia.”
A senior Wachovia official said that Wachovia’s lawyers had not seen the judge’s order and suggested that Citigroup’s actions were a pointless legal maneuver designed to destabilize the Wells deal.
The litigation could be a blockbuster, pitting some of the nation’s largest surviving financial institutions against one another and giving work to the most expensive legal talent money can buy. Citigroup is represented by the New York lawyer Gregory P. Joseph; Wachovia by David Boies of Boies, Schiller & Flexner; and Wells Fargo by Paul K. Rowe of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, according to people briefed on the matter.
Until late Thursday, Citigroup believed it had reached a deal with Wachovia after marathon talks last weekend under intense pressure from federal regulators worried about Wachovia’s financial condition. Regulators agreed to help Citigroup by absorbing losses over $42 billion.
Wells Fargo, which had walked away from talks with Wachovia, returned late Thursday with its surprise bid, in which Wells Fargo offered to buy all of Wachovia, not just its banking operations, for about $15 billion in stock, far more than Citigroup had offered. And Wells Fargo’s deal, which takes advantage of a lucrative tax loophole tied to deferred losses, would be structured without any direct government support.
Federal regulators did not block Wells Fargo’s proposal, and by early Friday morning, its merger with Wachovia was approved by the boards of both companies.
The move left Citigroup officials fuming. On Friday, they put out word to regulators and the public that Wachovia had breached an exclusivity agreement and that Wells Fargo had interfered with their deal. That night and Saturday morning, Citigroup officials huddled in a makeshift war room at the law offices of Davis Polk & Wardwell in Midtown Manhattan.
Federal regulators have been discussing the offers, with senior officials from the Federal Reserve encouraging the parties to reach a swift resolution, according to a person briefed on the matter.
Citigroup raised the stakes in the merger battle on Saturday afternoon, asking Justice Charles E. Ramos of New York State Supreme Court to issue an emergency order blocking the deal between Wachovia and Wells Fargo.
Representatives from the banks met at Justice Ramos’s home in Cornwall, Conn., late Saturday afternoon for more than three hours of oral arguments, according to people briefed on the situation.
In the unusual weekend session, Citigroup presented Justice Ramos with a 16-page complaint naming both Wells Fargo and Wachovia, and their boards, as defendants. But it has not yet filed the suit formally because the courts were closed.
Late Saturday, after several hours of intense legal jockeying, Justice Ramos issued an injunction effectively blocking the Wells Fargo deal, pending a hearing scheduled for Friday.
The agreement with Wachovia that Citigroup has cited and that contains the ban on negotiating with any other potential bidders was not a final merger contract but rather a letter agreement to “continue to proceed to negotiate definitive agreements.”
Lawyers not involved in the battle said Wachovia could defend the Wells Fargo deal by arguing that it was better for its shareholders. Wachovia is likely to claim that its fiduciary obligations — its responsibility to protect the interests of its investors — required it to consider the Wells Fargo bid and, given its higher price, to accept that bid.
The litigation could put regulators in a tough spot. The Wells Fargo deal may be better for taxpayers, but if it succeeds, in the future other financial institutions may not be willing to help the government, as Citigroup did, because of the risk that they might not reap the anticipated benefit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/05/business/05bank.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&exprod=myyahoo&adxnnlx=1223215453-FKFK4Bd5Fbzfek1GF0e5pQ&oref=slogin
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment